item veto
LowFormal, Technical, Political
Definition
Meaning
The power of an executive (e.g., a governor or president) to veto specific sections or items of a bill, especially an appropriations bill, without vetoing the entire bill.
A selective veto mechanism allowing the rejection of particular provisions, often used in budgetary contexts to eliminate specific spending items while approving the remainder of the legislation.
Linguistics
Semantic Notes
Primarily used in political science, constitutional law, and government contexts. The term is a compound noun where 'item' refers to a distinct provision or appropriation, and 'veto' refers to the rejection power.
Dialectal Variation
British vs American Usage
Differences
The concept is almost exclusively American. The UK parliamentary system does not grant its executive (the monarch/Prime Minister) an item veto power; financial bills must be accepted or rejected in full.
Connotations
In the US, it connotes executive budgetary control and political negotiation. In the UK, the term is largely academic when discussing foreign political systems.
Frequency
Extremely rare in British English. Used with moderate frequency in American political and journalistic discourse.
Vocabulary
Collocations
Grammar
Valency Patterns
The governor [verb] the item veto.The legislature [verb] the item veto.The bill was subject to an item veto.Vocabulary
Synonyms
Strong
Neutral
Weak
Vocabulary
Antonyms
Phrases
Idioms & Phrases
- “Wield the red pen (on the budget)”
Usage
Context Usage
Business
Rare. Might be used in discussions of government contracts or public sector budgeting.
Academic
Common in political science, public administration, and constitutional law papers.
Everyday
Very rare. Typically only encountered in news about state or federal budgeting.
Technical
Standard term in legal documents, state constitutions, and legislative procedures in the US.
Examples
By Part of Speech
verb
British English
- The power to item-veto is not recognised in our system.
American English
- The governor threatened to item-veto the controversial earmark.
adjective
British English
- The item-veto power is a topic of comparative politics seminars.
American English
- They debated the item-veto authority during the committee hearing.
Examples
By CEFR Level
- The leader said no to one part of the new law.
- The state governor used a special power to cancel only one part of the spending plan.
- Exercising the item veto, the president rejected several specific appropriations while signing the rest of the bill.
- Proponents argue that the item veto is an essential tool for fiscal responsibility, allowing executives to excise wasteful pork-barrel spending.
Learning
Memory Aids
Mnemonic
Imagine a shopping list (the bill). An item veto lets the shopper cross off specific, unwanted items (like 'caviar') while still buying everything else.
Conceptual Metaphor
THE BUDGET IS A TEXT; THE EXECUTIVE IS AN EDITOR WITH A RED PEN.
Watch out
Common Pitfalls
Translation Traps (for Russian speakers)
- Avoid translating 'item' as 'вещь' or 'предмет'. The correct conceptual translation is 'пункт' or 'статья'.
- Do not confuse with a general 'вето'. The key is selectivity: 'выборочное вето' or 'вето по статьям'.
Common Mistakes
- Using 'item veto' as a verb (e.g., 'He item vetoed the bill'). The standard phrasing is 'He used the item veto on...' or 'He exercised the item veto against...'.
- Capitalising it unless it starts a sentence or is in a title.
Practice
Quiz
In which political system is the 'item veto' most commonly found and used?
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Yes, in modern American political terminology, 'item veto' and 'line-item veto' are used interchangeably to refer to the power to veto specific sections of a bill.
No. The US President must sign or veto entire bills. The item veto power is held by the governors of most US states for state-level appropriations bills.
Yes, typically with the same supermajority vote (e.g., two-thirds) required to override a regular veto, depending on the specific state's constitution.
The primary argument is that it promotes fiscal discipline by allowing the executive to eliminate wasteful or unnecessary spending items ('pork') without derailing entire essential budgets.